DIA will decline from the January 18, 2019 high of 247.48 (aftermarket high on that day which was slightly higher than the market high of that day) to at least 217 by February 13, 2019. The decline to that price will have been 12% but indications are the decline will ultimately be greater than herein predicted.
Recall the December 25, 2018 (aftermarket) low in DIA was 215.93 and that level will be very attractive (support/resistance) to the market.
This prediction represents a small decline relative to the great wave from January 18, 2019 to April 19, 2019 (April 19 is Good Friday and markets are closed).
Thirty Three
January 21, 2019
Monday, January 21, 2019
Saturday, January 19, 2019
Third prediction and debriefing
The third prediction is appearing in advance of the second prediction for a reason. The third prediction of a market pivot is related to a greater trend of market movement than than the second prediction. The third prediction is for a decline the magnitude of that which occurred between October 11, 1929 (the secondary market top of the 1929 Great Crash) and November 13, 1929 (the bottom of the 1929 Great Crash though not the Great Depression bottom).
The decline to occur in the next 3 months was suggested in the previous post. It began at the top which occurred Friday at DJIA 24750. There should not be a higher high in the next several years according to mathematic relationships between time and price I have re discovered. This great decline is predicted to end between April 14 and April 19, 2019. The date of this low (whichever day occurs) is analogous with November 13, 1929.
Applying the same mathematic relationships DJIA will decline to a range of 12350 and 12550.
And now a debriefing. Yesterday before the market opened I predicted the market would rise to at least DJIA 24800 and that would be the last high before a great decline. As it turns out, DJIA rose to 24750 and did not meet the minimum level I claimed would occur. The prediction is a failure.
But the math did not fail. The mathematician failed in two regards. First, several prior 2018 market highs and lows mathematically point to one number, 248. To explain, draw three horizontally contiguous squares and write 247 in the left most, 248 in the middle one and 249 in the right most. Now, if I told you that I had selected 248, where would you find it. Obviously, right on top of the 248. But if I asked you where 247.50, where would you point? I'd hope, at the vertical side that separates the squares. The mathematical triangulations of ancient mathematics that I apply pointed to 248. I should have known it applied to a range of 247.50 to 248.50. Indeed, those same mathematics point to a point in the year which represents not an exact day, but a point that represents 5 days. Why should I think the lowest DJIA level would have been 248 which is only the midpoint of a range.
Second, I continue to work with the various concoctions of what I call swag math; Elliott Wave, Fibonacci price and time, analog movements.... endless methods created by analysts to describe markets, encourage subscriptions, encourage purchases. I was most swayed by a Fibonacci projection I'd created from internal waves of the market as far back as the December 25, 2018 low and as recent as the day before yesterday. Wow, so many wound ups at or near 248.99. That must be it. No logic, no relation to causal mathematics. I expanded my area of prediction to 248-249. Simply coincidence.
True mathematics is 'natural law.' Some people would as manipulating Fibonacci price or time levels is mathematics. Well, those methods use mathematics and logic that all too often "talks the book" of the analyst. But they do not involve the "natural law" that governs time and price.
The method that created the prediction yesterday (which should have been 24750 to 24850 by the end of the day) is based on natural law that governs time and price. Moreover, it is the law that governs all time and space in our world. And that law demands that price and time be interdependent; one determines the other and vice versa.
How quaint, time determines price and price determines time; circularity.
The decline to occur in the next 3 months was suggested in the previous post. It began at the top which occurred Friday at DJIA 24750. There should not be a higher high in the next several years according to mathematic relationships between time and price I have re discovered. This great decline is predicted to end between April 14 and April 19, 2019. The date of this low (whichever day occurs) is analogous with November 13, 1929.
Applying the same mathematic relationships DJIA will decline to a range of 12350 and 12550.
And now a debriefing. Yesterday before the market opened I predicted the market would rise to at least DJIA 24800 and that would be the last high before a great decline. As it turns out, DJIA rose to 24750 and did not meet the minimum level I claimed would occur. The prediction is a failure.
But the math did not fail. The mathematician failed in two regards. First, several prior 2018 market highs and lows mathematically point to one number, 248. To explain, draw three horizontally contiguous squares and write 247 in the left most, 248 in the middle one and 249 in the right most. Now, if I told you that I had selected 248, where would you find it. Obviously, right on top of the 248. But if I asked you where 247.50, where would you point? I'd hope, at the vertical side that separates the squares. The mathematical triangulations of ancient mathematics that I apply pointed to 248. I should have known it applied to a range of 247.50 to 248.50. Indeed, those same mathematics point to a point in the year which represents not an exact day, but a point that represents 5 days. Why should I think the lowest DJIA level would have been 248 which is only the midpoint of a range.
Second, I continue to work with the various concoctions of what I call swag math; Elliott Wave, Fibonacci price and time, analog movements.... endless methods created by analysts to describe markets, encourage subscriptions, encourage purchases. I was most swayed by a Fibonacci projection I'd created from internal waves of the market as far back as the December 25, 2018 low and as recent as the day before yesterday. Wow, so many wound ups at or near 248.99. That must be it. No logic, no relation to causal mathematics. I expanded my area of prediction to 248-249. Simply coincidence.
True mathematics is 'natural law.' Some people would as manipulating Fibonacci price or time levels is mathematics. Well, those methods use mathematics and logic that all too often "talks the book" of the analyst. But they do not involve the "natural law" that governs time and price.
The method that created the prediction yesterday (which should have been 24750 to 24850 by the end of the day) is based on natural law that governs time and price. Moreover, it is the law that governs all time and space in our world. And that law demands that price and time be interdependent; one determines the other and vice versa.
How quaint, time determines price and price determines time; circularity.
*** ***
The first low of what will soon become the Great Crash of 2019 actually occurred on December 25, 2018. Check it out. The markets were closed, but you will find that some poor soul sold DIA at 9:16PM on Christmas day. He found the perfect bottom to sell:
What a coincidence, the market saw its first bottom of the Great Crash of 2019 on the day Jesus was born.
Now consider the final bottom of the Great Crash of 2019 predicted to occur between April 13 and April 19. What if it occurs on April 19; Good Friday. Of course, the NYSE is closed that day, but what might happen in the premarket/aftermarket.
The second prediction will be posted in the next day or two. It will address one of the sub waves of the forthcoming Great Crash. I have an analog swag giving me February 13 at a DJIA level 12% lower than yesterday, but that is not the math of natural law which I promote.
Thirty Three
January 19, 2019
January 19, 2019
Friday, January 18, 2019
First prediction
Today, January 18, 2019, will mark a high in the Dow Jones Industrial Average secondary to the high of October 3, 2018. With DIA as a proxy, the high print will equal or exceed 248 not later than the aftermarket into January 19 (Saturday).
From this point forward to between April 19-24, 2019, DJIA and DIA will decline by more that 40%. At that date and price point, the first wave of the greatest stock market decline will have occurred. The April 2019 DJIA bottom will be lower than 12600.
From this point forward to between April 19-24, 2019, DJIA and DIA will decline by more that 40%. At that date and price point, the first wave of the greatest stock market decline will have occurred. The April 2019 DJIA bottom will be lower than 12600.
These predictions are not based on a market analog, Fibonacci, Elliott, or indicator projections of any kind. They are a result of mathematic and geometric logic that, if taken to a greater level of detail, can predict time and price to even greater granularity.
*** ***
All things are determined. Otherwise, it would be impossible to posit mathematic predictions that manifest in reality.
It is one thing to make predictions based upon the pseudo "science" (so self-proclaimed by its purveyors) known as statistical inference or the accumulation of observations embodied in wave theory, astrology...and the like. These endeavors are Man's conjecture filling the void between the few truths given us by God; they are the source of strife described in Rene Descartes' "Third Meditation."
God so structured all things according to such perfect order for all time that, should such have not occurred, mathematic prediction of the future cannot occur.
As it will happen, the bottom of this great market wave will occur attendant the 2019 celebration of Easter.
Thirty Three
January 18, 2019
January 18, 2019
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)